Been meaning to post this one for a while.
I imagine it's mere chance - both ads have been appearing for sometime in the New Yorker but always on different pages and never, as here, one above the other. Of course, these ads are one of the many reasons for still having a subscription to the paper and ink version. Someone who does maths should be able to work out the next time these two are likely to come into conjunction.
'Course, it might not be chance. Maybe a temp in the small ads department or setting the page has a wicked sense of humour.
And the New Yorker has visitied similar territory before - the June 9/16 front cover.
Saturday, 7 February 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Balancing the elephants
An insightful post from Simon Wren Lewis on fiscal reporting at the BBC and its recent report. Not much to disagree with ... except for t...
-
I hope that BBC DG George Entwistle’s decision to hold those “internal,independent and forensic” inquiries doesn’t turn out to be his big...
-
Was Desmond Tutu right to accuse Tony Blair - and George Bush, for that matter - of a "lie" ? It's a question that's a...
-
I should have known it would unleash the crazies, but there you are. The BBC commentary on the Thames pageant was, I tweeted, "lamenta...